Skip to content
All case studies
Case study, anonymised

Containerised phosphorus-removal plant for a UK water utility

The design pack for a containerised tertiary phosphorus-removal plant, shown anonymised: the deliverables and the method, not the client.

Designed · not built
  • Water treatment
  • Containerised plant
  • Controls design
  • Design pack

A UK water utility needed tertiary phosphorus removal at an existing works, to a discharge limit, where a conventional build was not the right fit. The answer was designed as a containerised plant: process, equipment, power and controls in one transportable unit, with the discharge obligation written into the design basis and every drawing and document held in a register with a revision log. The client, the site and the programme are not named, no figure is quoted, and the pack makes no claim that the plant was built: what can be shown is the shape of the engineering.

The brief

Phosphorus removal where a conventional build was not the right fit.

  • Client — a UK water utility; not named.
  • Need — tertiary removal of phosphorus and suspended solids at an existing works, to a discharge limit.
  • Constraint — limited space and time on site, which pointed to a plant inside a single shipping container.

The plant

A containerised unit, designed as a whole.

  • Process — coagulation, self-washing prefiltration and ultrafiltration membranes as the polishing step, inside one high-cube shipping container.
  • Power and control — a motor control centre, a PLC with an operator HMI, and a Modbus register map for the dosing and power units.
  • Layout — the general arrangement and a 3D model, so the equipment, the access and the maintenance space were checked before anything was priced.

The design pack

What the client received, document by document.

  • Process — the P&ID set and the process description.
  • Electrical — the MCC schedule, with the single-line diagram behind it.
  • Controls — the control philosophy (functional design specification), the Modbus register map and the HMI screens.
  • Safety — the HAZOP worksheet, drafted for the human HAZOP team to run.
  • Operations — the O&M manual skeleton and the commissioning plan.
  • Commercial — the bill of quantities and the OPEX estimate.

The method

How a pack like this is produced, and what it does not claim.

  • Sequence — requirements sheet, process selection, P&ID, control philosophy, register map, HMI prototype, HAZOP worksheet, then O&M, BoQ and OPEX.
  • Checks — tags on the P&ID were cross-checked against the Modbus map and the MCC schedule before review.
  • Document control — a document register and a revision log on every drawing and document.
  • Review — drafted with the division's document pipeline and reviewed by an engineer before release; handed over for engineer-of-record review and adoption.
  • Status — a design pack, produced for the client's review. It makes no claim that the plant was built or put into service.

What it led to

The template for the Design-Pack Factory.

  • Template — the pack's structure is the requirements sheet and section list the Design-Pack Factory drafts from, now in development.
  • Method — the same cross-checks, register and review run on every pack the factory produces.

A similar obligation to meet?

Tell us what you are deciding and we will come back with a fixed price in writing.